Presented to the seventh meeting of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD-7) in New York, April 1999
Prepared in December 1998, by IFN
Edited by Manfred Pils, International Friends of Nature
in cooperation with
Herbert Brückner, President International Friends
of Nature
Christian Baumgartner, Institut für Integrativen
Tourismus
Peter Glauser, Naturfreunde Schweiz
Thus, the International Friends of Nature welcome that the Commission
for Sustainable Development (CSD) has put this topic on the agenda for
its 1999 annual conference. As an international association focusing on
tourism, environment and regional development, we should like to contribute
to the discussion.
In the past few years, the term "sustainable tourism" has found its
way into the debate. In view of a globally interlinked economy and complex
relations between individual spheres of life and business, it is problematic
to use the term "sustainability" for single, isolated economic fields or
limited geographic areas. For this reason, this text will use the term
"sustainability strategies" in tourism and other fields.
In the past few years, many conferences, studies and institutions have
dealt with the topic tourism and sustainability. A number of principles
or catalogues for the implementation of sustainable development in tourism
were developed or adopted and published. However, what we are lacking is
a concrete balance sheet listing the impacts of tourism on the environment,
human society or economic prosperity. It is necessary to draw up such a
balance sheet to be able to set priorities and take specific measures.
The data required for such a balance sheet are still insufficient and only
allow for uncertain conclusions on the global impact and effects of tourism.
In this document for the CSD, the International Friends of Nature have
tried to prepare a global analysis supported by the specific data available,
and to draw from it conclusions as to the requirements and measures for
a sustainability strategy in tourism pertaining to individual players at
global and national level.
However, these figures should not make us forget that more than 75% of all travels still take place within the triad composed of the United States, Europe and Japan exclusively. And what is more, the dramatic increase of tourist activities in the Third World is also mainly due to holidaymakers from the triad. Nationals from third-world countries hardly play any role in the international tourist market. The roots of tourism, i.e. holidaymakers and their needs, as well as the majority of resources for investment into tourist facilities are thus almost exclusively located in the Northern industrialised countries.
Tourism fulfils important tasks as a counterbalance to every-day life in the industrial societies. Its most significant task is recreation, a counterweight to the monotony and burdens of the working life in nature, recreational facilities, sports or entertainment. Education, learning or new experiences also make for such counterbalancing functions.
From the perspective of the inhabitants of Northern industrialised nationals, tourism and leisure-time are spheres of life one is socially entitled to. At the Sofia meeting of 1985, the World Tourism Organization (WTO) phrased it along the following lines: "The right of the individual to recreation and leisure-time, reasonable limits to working hours, periodic paid leave and freedom of movement without borders within the framework of law is generally recognized." From the perspective of billions of people living in the Third World, the right to holidays and leisure-time is simply luxury because they can hardly survive on what their daily work provides them with.
This conflict of interests must be taken into consideration when tourism
and sustainability are discussed and negotiated on at a global level. The
International Friends of Nature think that measures to safeguard sustainability
in tourism must be taken at the roots of tourism activities, i.e. in the
Northern industrialised nationals, in consumer behaviour, and in the context
of investments into tourism within the framework of development aid.
| Major countries of origin in Europe
(in millions of travellers) |
The most popular destinations
(in millions of arrivals) |
| (West) Germany 49.7 | France 61.3 |
| United Kingdom 30.3 | USA 45.6 |
| France 14.9 | Spain 40.6 |
| Italy 14.4 | Italy 25.7 |
| Netherlands 13.7 | Hungary 22.9 |
| Belgium 11.2 | United Kingdom 19.4 |
| (East) Germany 9.8 | Austria 18.3 |
| Switzerland 9.5 | China 17.9 |
| Sweden 8.3 | Mexico 16.9 |
| Czechia, Slovakia 6.9 | Germany 15.2 |
The reasons for the dramatic growth of the tourist market are diverse: a higher standard of living in the industrial nations, more leisure-time and longer holidays, improved and less costly means of transport. Moreover, the share of certain groups which traditionally enjoy travelling and can be considered mobile is rising steadily: senior citizens, single persons and households without children.
Unfortunately, trends towards less ecologically sound types of travelling and tourism can be clearly identified in the general development of tourism:
4.2.1. Tourism spells Traffic: An Increase in Traffic-Related Pollution in Terms of Emissions and Noise
90% of the energy which a tourist consumes on average is used for arrival and departure. This alone goes to show that traffic is central to tourism and thus to traffic-related impacts. In 1990, civil aviation consumed roughly 176 million tons of kerosene - which was about 6% of global oil consumption - causing 550 million tons of CO2 emissions. Tourism accounts for 50% of air transport. As consumption is specially high at take-off and landing, the emission rates in short-distance trips are particularly high. After all, as much as 40% of all air journeys cover distances of less than 800 km.
| Means of transport | Average utilisation of capacity | Fuel consumption per 100 km and person |
| Train/short distance |
|
|
| Train/ICE, TGV |
|
|
| Car |
|
|
| Airplane (500 km) |
|
|
| Airplane (8,000 km) |
|
|
Means of transport for trips to tourist destinations 1996
| On road |
|
| By air |
|
| By train |
|
| By ship |
|
In this context, it is shocking to see that public transport facilities are increasingly reduced in peripheral regions, which practically forces tourists to use private passenger cars. This policy of austerity in public transport is complemented by the generous expansion of road networks and parking areas. Large-scale tourist attractions with more than 5 million visitors per year generate specially high volumes of traffic, which has repercussions on surrounding areas within distances of several hundred kilometres.
The consequences of such tourism-related increase in the traffic volume are as follows:
While demand in international tourism is rising, the number of destinations and global capacities is rising even faster by comparison. It cannot be overlooked that tourism is already partially suffering from overcapacities. For example, the European tourist industry has suffered some losses due to growing international competition in the past few years. If we do not succeed in coming to grips with the problem in the next few years, further problems can be expected in the tourist industry. At any rate, stepped-up global competition in tourism can already be observed, and it favours ecologically and socially dubious tendencies towards concentration because only large-scale enterprises and companies can gain a high profile in a global market or are in a position to cut down on costs.
The direct impact of this competition is found in the relative concentration of tourism in the traditional mass tourism areas, the thinning out of peripheral regions and the deterioration of the Third World's market position.
Large-scale enterprises and stronger regions prevail in the competition among operators and destinations. We are observing that operations become ever larger while bed-and-breakfast operations and smaller enterprises are driven out of the market. Mass tourism areas strongly expand their tourist infrastructures (e.g. transport facilities, roads, golf courses, artificial snow). In addition, large-scale tourist attractions such as adventure worlds and theme parks are established, increasingly polluting the surrounding regions.
Tourist regions join forces to organise common marketing activities so as to address certain target groups in a more effective way. Hotels become part of international hotel chains because overheads for marketing or purchasing can be reduced that way.
At the same time, tour operators are also undergoing a process of concentration as companies merge and thus obtain more dominant market positions. Such dominant positions of tour operators can have unfavourable consequences for regions because the operators will try to force their contracting partners to charge lower prices, thus putting the regions under pressure. Many environmental investments needed could be foregone because there is pressure to keep prices low.
At the same time that these concentration tendencies take place, the competitiveness of tourism in peripheral regions is waning. In Europe, the decline of agriculture has resulted in intensive rural exodus and commuting. Reduced agricultural management jeopardises the traditional farming landscape and rural tourism, which needs a minimum of infrastructure: landscape, paths, inns, shops, banks, post offices and a public transport network. In the Alpine region, many pilot projects are underway to improve local tourism - especially in combination with marketing farming produce - but these regions continue to suffer from the general market development. Even if tourism is directed towards sustainability, it will not be able to survive if minimum requirements, such as a range of functioning public transport connections, are not met. This has serious implications for the natural landscape of the regions because tourism is a considerable source of additional income e.g. enabling farmers to stay on their farms and preserve the landscape. For a long time, tourism had been a way of striking a balance between urban and rural areas. Under the conditions of a global tourism market, it becomes ever more difficult to continue striking such a balance.
4.2.4. Increasing Economic Dependency of the Third World
In their strategies, many third-world countries consider the tourist sector a source of income which gives rise to hopes for economic prosperity and foreign exchange brought in by tourists. The Third World is undergoing tremendous re-orientation as local governments and the World Bank as well as other global financial mechanisms work together. Giant tourist projects including the road, airports or dams needed, are emerging in Thailand, Burma, Laos or Southern China. Traditional businesses vanish, and the dependency of the Third World on selling raw materials is now threatening to be replaced by dependency on tourism. In some countries, the tourist industry already accounts for 30% of the GNP, in distant regions or on islands, the rate may even reach 90%.
The economic usefulness of such developments for the countries concerned remains open to doubt. According to a World Bank study, 55% of earnings from tourism in the Third World go back to the industrialised countries or the urban centres of the developing countries. On small islands, many commodities required to maintain the Western standards demanded by tourists in catering, accommodation or leisure-time facilities must be imported which accounts for a considerable foreign-exchange drain. Especially luxury tourism needs commodities and infrastructures which cannot be produced in the respective countries.
Since large hotels are usually owned by international chains or foreign companies, profits are ploughed back to the countries where these companies are domiciled. The liberalisation of global trade and services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which entered into force in 1995, will also undermine the options individual countries have to control the tourist industry and its profits at national level.
The tourist sector is largely characterised by seasonal dependencies, and jeopardised by political instability, natural disasters or epidemic diseases. Moreover, it is clear that it also depends on the business cycle in the source countries. Any monostructural orientation on tourism thus means preparing the ground for crises in the years to follow. Large international companies, such as air carriers, hotel chains and tour operators, are in constant search of new destinations and may thus decisively influence the fate of a tourist region in a positive or negative way.
4.2.5. Serious Socio-Cultural Impacts and Violations of Human Rights
It is especially in the developing countries that tourism, sponsored by capital from the industrial states, has serious impacts on the social system of the regions concerned. Traditional branches of the economy and occupations in farming and fishery disappear, they come to be replaced by underpaid and unqualified jobs in tourist facilities. It is not rare that people inhabiting entire stretches of land or coastline are expropriated for the benefit of investors who build hotels, holiday villages or other facilities. Rivers and bays polluted by effluents jeopardise fishing, one of the main sources of income for the local population.
As a result of uprooting, cases of alcohol abuse and crime among the
population become ever more frequent. What is worst, however, is the growing
incidence of child labour and prostitution in some countries. On the basis
of case studies, the International Labour Organization (ILO) assumes that
about 13 to 19 million children and young people world-wide work in tourism.
Conditions in the booming sex industry of Thailand and the Philippines
are slavery-like.
| In 1998, 506 years after the discovery of America, the Indians of Honduras put Christopher Columbus on trial for genocide, pilfering and theft. On October 11, 1998, 1,000 Honduran Indians prevented tourists from entering Maya sights to protest against Columbus. |
Another problem is that policymakers in tourism deliberately and increasingly want to accommodate the wishes of tourists for an idyllic setting, tradition etc. The majority of tourists want to stay in a four-star hotel, expecting an infrastructure that guarantees full mobility and a maximum of entertainment. At the same time, they want a historical village structure with traditional festivities, old farmhouses, low traffic and calm. A tendency towards turning whole regions into museums debases entire villages and their inhabitants, turning them, and even their animals, into players on a stage pretending that the idylls of former days are still alive.
Further social costs threaten to arise from the declining soil management in uphill areas. While forests and meadows were cultivated in former times, with the farmers thus considerably contributing to protection from avalanches and landslides, such protection of roads and built environment now requires expensive technical measures instead.
4.2.6. Ecological Impacts
Wherever tourist activities are strongly concentrated, excess exploitation of the landscape results in significant damage to nature. Coastline areas (islands, coastline waters, coral reefs, lagoons, mangrove forests, bays and dunes), high mountain zones, wetlands (bogs, rivers and lakes), forests (rainforests, Alpine protective forests) as well as the coastlines in the Arctic and Antarctica are specially endangered. Dangers are manifold:
| Rural population |
|
| Urban population |
|
| Average tourist |
|
| Luxury tourist |
|
For example, we know that
A minimum number of indicators will be needed for a better assessment of the impact of tourism on the environment, and the orders of magnitude involved:
| Area / Measures | Players in charge |
| General | |
| 1. preparation of national action plans to implement sustainability strategies in tourism under the Guidelines (item 6) | national governments in co-operation with representations of interest and NGOs |
| 2. making the Guidelines for Sustainability in Tourism (item 6) a yardstick for national grants to tourist projects | national governments |
| 3. measures suited to reflect external environmental and social costs in prices and thus create fair competition | national governments |
| 4. improved control on land use | national governments |
| 5. improved authorisation procedures so that all communities and regions concerned (including those which are directly hit by additional traffic or emissions) are informed in a timely manner and are taken into consideration through the impositions of requirements in the final decision | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 6. associations, trade unions, NGOs should contribute to the implementation of sustainability strategies in tourism and constantly monitor their implementation | associations, representations of interest, trade unions, NGOs |
| Environment | |
| 1. strict implementation and enforcement of environmental standards on noise, drinking water, bathing water, waste-water treatment and air emissions | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 2. introduction of CO2/energy taxes | national governments |
| 3. identification and protection of endangered areas | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 4. creation of buffer zones around sensitive areas, creation of rest zones and integrated biotopes | local authorities |
| 5. prohibition of environmentally harmful sports in jeopardised regions (e.g. helicopter skiing, gorge climbing, rafting) | national governments |
| 6. mandatory regulations governing snow production for ski slopes, the cultivation and irrigation of golf courses, and other facilities as may be harmful to the environment | national governments |
| 7. creation of substitute areas for green zones lost | local authorities, project operators |
| Economy and Structural Policy | |
| 1. promotion of co-operation between sectors and of integrated development models across sectors (tourism, agriculture, nature, transport) | national governments in co-operation with local authorities, representations of interest, NGOs, private investors |
| 2. diversification of the regional economy | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| Tourism | |
| 1. discussion and development of a mission statement for tourism development at regional level (nature, culture) | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 2. limited numbers of visitor beds per inhabitant and limited capacities for day trip facilities, in particular in coastal regions, natural areas and mountains | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 3. implementation of the Guidelines for Sustainability Strategies in Tourism (item 6) by private suppliers of tourist services | representations of interest, trade unions, NGOs, private companies |
| 4. strict rules for new structures and infrastructures (environmentally sound construction, preservation of building culture) | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 5. governmental grants for tourist projects only if they conform with the Guidelines (item 6) | national governments |
| 6. improvement of visitor management | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 7. obligation for tour operators to state both prices and resource consumption for individual travels, and to inform tourists about environmental and social measures at the destination | national governments |
| 8. building of environmental awareness of people involved in management of tourist areas (continued training) | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 9. measures to sensitise and inform consumers on tourism and sustainability at local level and at tourist facilities | national governments in co-operation with local authorities, representations of interest, NGOs |
| 10. no offers of trips or events in countries which violate human rights, or tolerate prostitution, child prostitution and child labour | private suppliers |
| 11. levies on overnight stays in tourist centres to be used for landscape conservation, environmental measures and visitor management in the surrounding region | national governments |
| 12. better dispersion of holidays | national governments |
| 13. programmes to stimulate leisure time and recreation located either on the outskirts of cities or in urban areas | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 14. conveying concepts and criteria for sustainability strategies in the framework of tourist training programmes | national governments |
| 15. improving the qualification and continued training of domestic labour in tourism by long-term programmes | national governments, representations of interests and trade unions |
| 16. strengthening the civil society: empowerment of the population concerned by tourism to enable informed participation | national governments in co-operation with local authorities, trade unions, NGOs |
| 17. measures to return to original state and redevelopment of the degraded environment in regions past ecological and social viability | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| Transport: | |
| 1. public subsidies should be made contingent on the use and utilisation of capacities of existing infrastructure. Maximum grants should be given when utilisation of capacities is optimised or additional infrastructure is created by project operators, no subsidies to greenfield developments or developments overburdening the existing infrastructure | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 2. road pricing and support to public transport or to more environmentally sound means of transport out of such income | national governments |
| 3. introduction of airplane fuel tax and/or higher airport taxes unless this is done at global level | national governments |
| 4. furtherance of environmentally sound means of transport | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 5. development and promotion of alternative transport models | national governments in co-operation with local authorities, private investors |
| 6. introduction of a levy on infrastructure based on the number of visitors arriving in passenger cars to be used for the financing of public transport; direct financial support to public transport by project operators is to be credited to this levy. | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 7. mandatory project operator co-financing when additional transport infrastructure is built (100% in roads, 50% in public transport) | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| 8. improved management of traffic flows | national governments in co-operation with local authorities |
| Tourists and Consumers | |
| 1. introduction of an international quality mark for sustainable tourist offers | national governments, representations of interest, trade unions, NGOs, private companies |
| 2. information for consumers concerning ecological travelling | national governments, representations of interest, trade unions, NGOs, private companies |
| 3. development and promotion of a tourists' code of conduct | national governments, representations of interest, trade unions, NGOs |
| 4. promotion of sustainable life-styles: quality takes priority over quantity | national governments, representations of interest, trade unions, NGOs |